Friday, 17 July 2015

Five immediate concerns that can take the wind out of Sensex's sails



The Economic Times

Five immediate concerns that can take the wind out of Sensex's sails

NEW DELHI: Indian stocks might have remained resilient in the wake of global turmoil, but analysts believe that there are at least five immediate concerns that have the potential to take the wind out of the sails of market barometers.

Markets are likely to face headwinds in the form of sub-par monsoon rains, parliamentary disruptions, muted June quarter earnings, US Fed rate hike and debt crisis in Greece. However, analysts expect indices to hit fresh record highs in the next 12 months.

In the interim, they are likely to trade in a range.

"We have always been a structural bull for the Indian market. I do feel that the risk-on sentiment is gradually creeping back to the markets after a very difficult several months on the back of Greece and Chinese market volatility," says Tai Hui, Chief Market Strategist - Asia, JPMorgan Asset Management in an interview with ET Now.

"The only two worries I have in mind is - one, how the Fed rate hike will impact emerging markets including India. Second is earnings, because so far, the key missing ingredient to a much more forceful rally in Indian market is earnings," he added.

The S&P BSE Sensex has risen over 2,000 points in a matter of a month. However, further upside remains capped and markets are likely to consolidate before they resume an uptrend.

"After the first year of the new government, expectations were a bit ahead of what the reality was. It has taken time for things to change on the ground. I believe what has happened now is that expectations have come down," says Hiren Ved, Director & CIO, Alchemy Capital Management in an interview with ET Now on Thursday.

"It is not reality versus what happens, but it is expectations versus where you are in the markets. The expectations are now more muted, especially after the fourth quarter numbers. It is not a V-shape recovery, it is a long U-shape recovery in India. My sense is that we are base building before the next phase of leg up in the Indian markets," he added.

After this phase of consolidation, which might last for another quarter or two, markets should head higher.

Apart from local factors, analysts are of the view that valuation of Indian markets remains stretched. Most of the rally in the calendar year 2014 was based on optimism, where P/E expanded, while earnings remained muted.

Experts are of the view that growth in earnings is more likely to drive markets higher, and growth is expected to happen only after a couple of quarters.

"Indian valuations remain stretched at an 18.0x 12-month PE. In addition, consensus seems over-optimistic on 2015 EPS growth, forecasting 15-16% versus our estimate of 10-11%, based on our coverage universe," said an HSBC report.

"In our view, if earnings start to be in line with consensus forecasts over the course of the year, it could facilitate a change in sentiment towards India. A low base for FY15 should be supportive of growth," added the report.

We have collated a list of five factors which are likely to weigh on Indian market in the near term: 

Monsoon in July remains muted, RBI may not cut rates: 

After recording above-normal rains in June, July has remained more or less muted and that might become a concern for markets.

"It is pretty clear that the central bank will not go ahead and lower rates at the August meeting because the monsoon progress is pretty much questionable as July had a weak start," says Radhika Rao, Economist, DBS Bank, in an interview with ET Now.

Private weather forecaster Skymet may revise its monsoon forecast by the end of this month as it expects July rains to be less than its earlier forecast.

The India Meteorological Department (IMD) said on Thursday that monsoon rainfall so far has been 6% below the long-period average (LPA).

Below-normal monsoon rains will also impact earnings, which would also cap upside for markets.

Vibhav Kapoor, Group CIO, IL&FS, is of the view that if the monsoons do not turn out to be good, then even the September earnings will come into question.

"So, all in all, there is a balance between some positives and some negatives and therefore the market is going to stay in this range for some more time. Also, the valuations, if you look at least at the Nifty overall, they are not that cheap, they are about 17 times FY16 earnings," he added.

Parliamentary disruptions: 

The opposition parties have enough reasons to disrupt the proceedings and stall any meaningful legislative work, said a Sharekhan report.

In the recent past, the emergence of controversies like the Lalitgate scandal and the Vyapam scam have provided enough fodder to the opposition parties.

The brokerage firm feels that any more delay in passing of the key bills like the Goods & Services Tax would be viewed quite negatively by investors.

"We have the monsoon session starting next week. That may create some sort of uncertainty in the market because the going for the government may be slightly difficult at this point of time because of the issues which were raised over last couple of months," says Vivek Mahajan, Head of Research, Aditya Birla Money.

"It may suggest that the rally is getting halted, but I will be a buyer in any correction in the market place," he added.

Muted corporate earnings: 

Q4FY15 was a dismal quarter for India Inc, with topline, EBITDA and bottom line declining 4%, 10% and 11% YoY, respectively. In fact, these growth numbers were even below the Lehman crises lows, say experts. June and September quarters are unlikely to be any better.

"Currently, the PEs cannot expand beyond a point. We believe that June quarter as well as September quarter earnings momentum is likely to be quite muted and may be December onwards, because of the lower base of last year as well as some amount of supportive government policies that have happened in the recent past, you will start seeing some uptick in earnings momentum and that is when probably there will be a case for PE re-rating," says Harsha Upadhyaya, CIO - Equities, Kotak AMC.

US Federal Reserve rate hike:

Reiterating her earlier view, the US Federal Reserve Chairperson Janet Yellen on Wednesday said that the US Federal Bank may kickstart raising interest rates this year itself, which might fuel volatility across emerging markets including India.

For the last three or four months, the market has been gradually pricing in the first hike coming as early as December 2015.

"Yellen's commentary validates what our house view has been - that the rates will go up with the first rate hike pencilled in for December," says Radhika Rao, Economist, DBS Bank.

"It has been made clear that although Fed's policy trajectory will still be data dependent, the current economic indicators are sufficient to justify the starting of a rate hike cycle," she added.

The Fed is liklely raise rates in December, and will take interest rates higher by another percentage point over the course of the next year. Rates are likely to go up, but as not aggressively as in the previous rate hike cycles, she added.

Greece overhang continues: 

German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble said in a letter to the president of Germany's lower house of parliament that the International Monetary Fund would not be involved in the payment of a first tranche of a planned third Greek bailout, said a Reuters report.

That tranche is due to be paid in mid-August, according to the letter, seen by Reuters, in which Schaeuble requested that the parliament agree to open talks on a third Greek bailout.

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/stocks/news/five-immediate-concerns-that-can-take-the-wind-out-of-sensexs-sails/articleshow/48111725.cms

Thursday, 16 July 2015

In Shadow of Chinese Rout, India Fights Illegal 'Dabba' Market


In Shadow of Chinese Rout, India Fights Illegal 'Dabba' Market


MUMBAI: A crack team of regulators and specially trained police are spearheading India's efforts to stamp out the country's "shadow" market in shares and commodities, turning up the heat on backstreet traders who threaten the broader financial system.So-called "dabba" trading has been a headache for regulators for years, but a government push to crack down on the black economy and clean up the Indian market for retail investors has given a fresh boost to efforts to stamp out the multi-billion-dollar parallel system, which bypasses market rules and taxes.

Though brushing off comparisons, regulators and brokers acknowledge China's dramatic stock market rout of recent weeks has also served as a stark reminder of the risks -- even if troubles across the border were exacerbated by China's far higher proportion of retail investment and margin lending.

"Dabba trading and any other unlawful trading practices do present a risk in the market and need to be curbed," said Nirmal Jain, chairman of domestic brokerage and financial services firm IIFL. "It's not good for anybody."

There is no reliable estimate of the size of India's dabba markets, but the practice is widespread and brokers estimate share volumes are likely to add up to at least several hundred million dollars daily, compared to an average of 175.25 billion rupees ($2.76 billion) on formal exchanges.

In commodity markets, estimates put trade at multiples of legitimate business. A senior official at leading commodity bourse MCX said earlier this year that the dabba market could be eight to 10 times the regulated derivatives market.

Commodity derivatives worth $265.54 billion were traded on India's exchanges in the first six months of the year, less than a third of the volumes two years ago before a new transaction tax was introduced. Market participants and traders estimate a bulk of the those trades has moved to the dabba markets.

Officials at the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) say they are worried about contagion if markets turn volatile, particularly if dabba traders are using both on-market and off-market trades to hedge their exposures.

Though there is rarely proof, brokers say they sometimes see instances of dabba causing unusual market moves. In early 2013, brokers attributed a sell-off in mid and small-cap stocks over several days in part to a major Calcutta investor liquidating actual shareholdings after losing heavily in the dabba market.

"There is a significant risk of spillover in the financial system," said a senior regulator at SEBI.

SEBI, which will be overseeing commodities after a planned merger with the Forward Markets Commission, has set up a three-member team to revise its dabba policy, SEBI officials said.

The regulator said in a statement to Reuters that it was also working with state police and had set up 16 regional offices, given the proportion of trades happening outside India's main financial hubs, in regions like Gujarat.

LOSING BUSINES

Modelled after the "bucket shops" prevalent in the United States a century ago, dabba trading -- after the Hindi word for "box" -- sprung up after India opened its markets in the 1990s, mainly as a way to avoid high taxes.

Although India has been steadily cutting the securities transaction tax for equities, other taxes have made trading more expensive for ordinary investors. These include taxes on short-term capital gains and a business tax.

Dabba trades also allow investors to avoid SEBI registration requirements or the margin requirements set by exchanges.

In a typical dabba trade, an investor places an order with a broker, who logs the trade but does not usually buy the actual security. As a result, it is a straight bet on a capital gain, without any hope of dividend income.

When the investor cashes out, the broker would need to pay back the profit should that security have appreciated, or receive money should it be a losing bet.

The ease of dabba trade has made it particularly difficult to root out, even though Indian laws stipulate stringent penalties of up to 10 years imprisonment as well as fines of up to 250 million rupees ($3.94 million).

Indian households own only about $400 billion in equities, compared with $1.1 trillion in bank fixed deposits and $1 trillion in gold, according to Morgan Stanley. But brokers say squeezed clients mean they are losing out regardless.

"Most of my clients are shifting to dabba," said Nishant Jain, a broker in the state of Rajasthan.

"They don't want to trade officially because of the disadvantages."
http://www.newindianexpress.com/business/In-Shadow-of-Chinese-Rout-India-Fights-Illegal-Dabba-Market/2015/07/16/article2923330.ece

Sunday, 12 July 2015

6 Reasons Not to Trade During the First 30 Minutes


6 Reasons Not to Trade During the First 30 Minutes

The first 30 minutes is the most volatile time in the equities market. As a new or even seasoned trader, you will gravitate to the first 30 minute slot like a moth to a flame. It really comes down to the level of action present in the market early in the day, which keeps us all mesmerized.

In this article, we will cover 6 reasons you should avoid trading during the first 30-minutes in order to increase your odds of long-term success
.

#1 – Violent Morning Gaps


Whenever you see a violent morning gap in the market, it’s really anyone’s call if the stock will go up or down during the first few 5-minute bars. The stock is likely reacting to some overnight news which, is fueling activity from retail investors and institutions.

To this point, your risk exposure in the morning is high as a stock has already risen or dropped 15% or 20%. To illustrate this point, let’s take a look at a few charts.

Morning Gap Example 1

Morning Gap Example 1
Do you honestly have any idea which direction the stock will take? Without scrolling lower, make a call of higher or lower. Remember at this point, the stock is already down 16% on the day.

Morning Gap 2

Morning Gap 2

How many of you guessed correctly?

Let’s take a look at another example from the same trading day.
Morning Gap Example 3

Morning Gap Example 3

Resist the urge to scroll lower on the page; take your best guess.
Morning Gap Example 4

Morning Gap Example 4

Who guessed the stock would go into a consolidation phase?

Imagine playing this high stakes game every single day in the market. You are going to drive yourself crazy trying to anticipate which stock will continue in the direction of the primary trend or reverse sharply. To put it bluntly, it’s not worth trying to figure this out and the risk is too great as your stops will likely be tripped.

Attempting to jump in front of or on the same train as a violent morning gap is like taking a cake out of the oven before it’s fully baked.

The point of allowing the first 30 minutes to play out, is for a formation to take shape in order to determine if the bulls or bears will come out on top. Jumping into a morning gap before this process is able to fully develop, is no better than flipping a coin.


#2 – Emotions

Emotions
Emotions

I love passionate people, who really get worked up about what they are doing. To see an athlete let out a tremendous roar as they score the game-winning goal, gets everyone in the stands and fans watching from home pumped up.

But, similar to candidates running for President, traders need to be a little flat when it comes to their emotions. In the first 30 minutes, the market will present some pretty wild scenarios and more than any other time of day, you can easily get pulled into the action.

Once you are pulled into a trade and your emotions begin to take over, the money will leave you faster than you can blink.

Brett Steenbarger, Ph.D., has done some extensive research into trading psychology and emotions. Check out this cool article titled “Trading Emotionally with Intelligence.

Just to be clear, if you are an emotional person and more importantly and emotional trader – avoid the first 30 minutes.

#3 – 10am Reversal

The 10am reversal is one of the most vicious times in the trading day. For those that have been day trading the markets for a number of years, you will notice that at 10am things start to get interesting.

So, why does the market often course correct at 10am? It really comes down to the number of participants. For starters, it’s the first time that the 1-minute, 5-minute, 15-minute and 30-minute traders all have a candle print on the chart. The reason I have not accounted for the 60-minute time frame, is because these traders are often focused on swing trading and are not what I would consider day traders.

The other reason for the 10am reversal is that most of the traders that were either up or down significantly from an overnight move have been able to close out of their position. This accounts for all of the traders that are exiting trades due to sizable gains on a morning gap, to those that were liquidated due to margin calls.

Still not a believer that the market shifts right at 10am? Well have a look at the QQQ over a two-week period.
10am reversal
10am reversal

Now, this will not always play out to an exact science; however, 10am is a time slot where your antenna needs to perk up. In the above example of the QQQs, each blue line is at 10am and you can see how quickly the market reverses course from the primary trend. As a day trader, the last thing you want is to establish a position, only to have the market turn against you.

Once the position goes against you, the volatility in the market dries up after the first hour, so the odds of the market again reversing and going in your desired direction are slim to none.

During ’08 – ’09 I was actively trading the gold market. Some of my favorites were Royal Gold (RGLD) and Barrick Gold (ABX). Like clockwork, I would take a position only to have the entire gold market shift at 10am. I remember fighting the gold market for 3 to 4 weeks, where I would establish a position prior to 10am and then end up giving back all or the majority of my gains on the trade.

It was the most frustrating experience, because during the ’08 – ’09 period, the gold market was extremely volatile as the equities markets were getting slammed due to the mortgage crisis.

I ended up focusing on other sectors because the gold market kept taking me out to the wood shed. Have you experienced similar trading challenges with a given sector?

#4 – No Clear Trading Formation

I am not some chart purist running around with a thick binder of formations; however, I do need to have some idea of the struggle between the bulls and bears. For example, I would like to see if the stock is making higher highs and lower lows.

One could argue that you can find patterns within the first half an hour if you look at shorter time frames (i.e. 1-minute or tick charts). While this is true, I give more credence to formations when there is a critical mass of market participants. For me, tick charts and 1-minute charts don’t pack enough punch to make entry decisions on a trade.

Let’s take a look at a few stocks on a 5-minute chart and try to speculate the next move of the stock.

No Formation 1
No Formation 1


No Formation 2
No Formation 2

Unlike the previous section where we covered violent gaps, I’m not going to show you how these stocks ended up on the day. You can see visually that on a 5-minute chart, you have no way of knowing which way a stock will break with any degree of certainty based on one or two bars.

Think of it this way, you need to have just enough data to make a decision, but not so much data that you miss the trade.

To combat the need to jump in front of the trade, I started to institute rules, which required a stock to make a new high or low prior to me entering the trade. This naturally resulted in patterns that I could trade versus trading the first one or two candlesticks.


#5 – Not Enough Experience


It took me years of day trading before I was able to effectively trade within the first 30 minutes.

Just to be clear, I still do not open a new position until 9:50am.

Whenever I placed trades early in the am, let’s say 9:35 or 9:40, things would go against me for all of the reasons aforementioned in this article.

If you are a trader, odds are you believe in writing your own ticket and I fully understand that mindset. You also think in terms of probabilities, because we make our living based on controlling our risk and reward on each and every trade.

If 90% of traders fail at day trading within the first year, then I think we can agree on the fact day trading is difficult. Now compound this number with the fact you are trading during the most volatile time of the day, and the odds of success become even fainter.

Like anything else in life, you have to first learn to crawl before you can walk.

#6 – Economic Reporting

Economic Reports
Economic Reports

Another reason to avoid trading prior to 10am is the reporting of key economic data. Examples of key economic data released at 10am include the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Report, Pending Home Sales, Consumer Confidence and the ISM to name a few.

As the reports are released at 10am, each one has the ability to move the market. To illustrate an example of this, in June 2013, the ISM (Institute for Supply Management) report was released twice within a 3-hour time frame, which resulted in a volatile day in the stock market as traders reacted to different numbers quantifying the health of the American manufacturing sector.

As a new trader, you will want to avoid being trapped in large market moves related to global or national news events which could impact your trade. It’s tough enough just trying to evaluate the setup, let alone understanding external factors outside of your control.

Summary

If you start to think about the market in terms of difficulty, the first 30 minutes is the black diamond of skiing. If the end game for you is profits, then why take the hardest path to get to the bottom of the slope? All that matters is you get there without running into a tree.- See more at: http://tradingsim.com/blog/6-reasons-not-to-trade-during-the-first-30-minutes/#sthash.MeuUOoWo.dpuf

Saturday, 11 July 2015

Chinese stock markets


Explainer: what's the turmoil in the Chinese stock market all about?

Why the Shanghai stock exchange should be thought of more as a casino than as a proper stock market.
 
Photo Credit: Greg Baker/AFP
The Chinese stock markets have experienced significant turmoil in recent weeks, with the Shanghai Composite Index – the country’s major reference – falling by 32% since June 12. But this fall was preceded by an equally sharp rise of 150% over the previous nine months. In the 20 years since I have been working in finance, I’ve never seen anything like this. So what is going on with the Chinese stock market?

There are several reasons for this unusual behaviour: firstly, when I teach stock market investment to my Chinese students, I always remind them that the Shanghai stock exchange should be thought of more as a casino, rather than as a proper stock market. In normal stock markets, share prices are – or, at least, should be – linked to the economic performance of the underlying companies. Not so in China, where the popularity of the stock market directly correlated with the fall in casino popularity.

Stocks and casinos

In China, given the low credibility of the financial statements published by listed companies, investors need to rely on other tools to predict share price performance. These tools include a heavy reliance on technical analysis and charts – a method that tends to predict future share price based purely on the company’s past performance, with no regards to its fundamentals. Even the name of the company is often neglected; all that matters is the historic price performance.

While this technique is also used in Western markets, my experience in China is that it is the predominant method for investment. Hence the disconnect between a share’s price movements and economic fundamentals.

There has been, however, a strong correlation between the stock market’s performance and the revenues of the casinos in Macau. While gambling revenues were growing at a fast pace in Macau, people largely ignored the stock market – whose performance was, largely, uninteresting for a number of years. But since China’s president, Xi Jinping, launched a campaign against corruption, gambling activity has started to decline. This was when the stock market started to move up. Coincidence?

Real estate

The other reason why the stock market experienced a sharp increase between September 2014 and June 2015 relates to the Chinese real estate market. In recent years, investment in real estate has been the only way for ordinary citizens to get returns higher than the paltry 3% offered by bank deposits (yes, 3% is paltry in an economy that grows at more than 10% a year in nominal terms). But high capital requirements and growing regulations on the purchase of real estate has meant that benefiting from this growing market has been increasingly difficult for ordinary citizens.

Commercial banks therefore – in an effort to mimic real-estate returns – started to offer so-called “wealth management products”, which are basically funds that invest in the real estate market. These funds were then repackaged and resold in the retail market. Chinese individuals would take their savings out of current accounts and placed them into these wealth management products and achieve returns similar to those available to buyers of real estate.

This was the modus operandi until the beginning of 2014, at which point the economy and the real estate markets started to show signs of weakness. The once-easy money coming from the property market started to disappear and people with wealth management products started to get into financial trouble and some of them even defaulted on their payments (the government bailed them out, so no individual was at a loss).

Monetary policy

From November 2014 the Chinese central bank, worried about the slowing economy, decided to institute an aggressive monetary policy to rapidly lower interest rates with the aim of stimulating the economy, which also caused current account rates to decline. This created a perverse scenario where individuals who were already seeking returns higher than those offered by current accounts were then denied the opportunity to get them through real estate because of the falling market. As a result, deposit rates were cut further and the return on current accounts became even more dissatisfying. Commercial banks found themselves in a quandary.

With the casino route closed and real estate off the table, what was left? The Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets: the two main stock markets that had remained dormant for years.

Banks then turned the old real estate wealth management products into investment vehicles to purchase shares directly on the stock markets. A large portion of customer deposits were then directly invested in the stock market, which then surged on the back of that demand.

An empty bubble?

Meanwhile, however, nothing happened to the earnings forecasts of the underlying companies. In fact, if anything, they should have been revised down because of the deteriorating macroeconomic condition of the Chinese domestic economy. But of course, as we said before, no one really looks at earnings and price ratios.

Due to the desire to maximise returns, many individuals then used leverage so that the inflow of money in the stock market was even higher. For example, if someone wishes to purchase shares for a total value of 100RMB, but only has available cash in his deposit account of, say, 60RMB, he could borrow the remaining 40RMB from the brokerage house. By doing this, the original source of 60RMB was turned into an upward push of the stock price equivalent to the full 100RMB. This drove strong share price growth between September 2014 and June 12, 2015.

What happened on June 12? Nothing. Just some smarter investors (generally large institutional investors, which represent 20% of all market volumes) started to sell and the rest of the market followed suit. Fear got hold of small investors (who represent 80% of the market) and selling accelerated, with margin calls making those selling do so even faster, and here we are today – a 32% drop and counting since the peak of mid-June.

In the past few days, the Chinese government has adopted a number of measures to try to mitigate this crash. The market finally reacted positively to a relaxation of restrictions on margin requirements. But this measure simply transfers the risks from investors to brokerage houses – it does not change the fact that the market has increased by 70% over the last year. The bubble, if it is a bubble, still has a long way to go.

Saturday, 4 July 2015

NSE plans to seek board approval for listing


NSE plans to seek board approval for listing

A decision will be taken once the nation’s securities regulator issues revised guidelines for new applications for exchange listings

Mumbai: The National Stock Exchange of India Ltd., the country’s biggest bourse, plans to seek board approval for an initial share sale, chairman Sunil Behari Mathur said.
“The board has to take some conscious calls about the right timing of the share sale,” Mathur said in a telephone interview on Friday. A decision will be taken once the nation’s securities regulator issues revised guidelines for new applications for exchange listings.
The bourse, which counts Goldman Sachs Group Inc. among its investors, is facing pressure from some of its shareholders to list as they look for an exit from one of the most regulated businesses in the South Asian country. Competition has also intensified after a third Indian bourse started operations in February 2013.
The NSE, as it is locally known, handles twice the volume of its 140-year-old competitor BSE Ltd. in the cash segment and controls 80% of India’s $28 billion a day stock- derivatives market. In 2012, the BSE proposed an IPO after starting an incentive program to lure derivatives traders in 2011.
Under local rules, the shares of NSE, when ready for trading, need to be listed on another exchange to avoid conflicts of interest. For the same reason, the NSE will also need to cast off its regulatory function.
Life Insurance Corp. of India (LIC) and State Bank of India (SBI), both of which are controlled by the government, hold 10% each in NSE, according to data provided by the exchange. Goldman Sachs Strategic Investments Ltd. owns 5%.
Multi Commodity Exchange of India Ltd., which owns warrants in Metropolitan Stock Exchange of India Ltd., in March 2012 became the first Indian bourse to sell shares. The sale was oversubscribed 54 times as investors bet the exchange would gain from expanding trade in bullion, metals, crude oil and agriculture contracts. Bloomberg
http://www.livemint.com/Money/55XQNBIXOtSe2gIOFpTdAJ/NSE-plans-to-seek-board-approval-for-listing.html

Sunday, 7 June 2015

High frequency trading and how it affects you




What is high frequency trading and how it affects you?
SREE IYER  20/04/2015 01:02 PM

What is it about high frequency trading that makes one rich overnight? Is it legal? If so, why is everyone not doing it?
 
I was always fascinated with Michael Lewis's writings... His Liar's Poker was truly a path breaker, giving fantastic insights into what happened in Wall Street in the 80s. On one of my TV channel surfing experiences, I stumbled on to an interview of Brad Katsuyama by Maria Bartiromo in Fox Business Channel on his new IEX exchange. In the course of this chat, I learnt that Michael Lewis had written about Brad and his company IEX in his new book titled ‘Flash Boys’ and that got me interested. If there is anyone who can explain a complex topic in simple, easy-to-understand terms, it is Michael Lewis. 
 
I left for India shortly thereafter and while in Bangalore, picked up Flash Boys. I had intended to read it but got caught up with other stuff and could not get to it. On my flight from Bangalore to Mumbai, I came across an article of how 2 friends moved back from Wall Street to a tiny office in Bandra-Kurla complex and are generating business worth Rs4,000 crore a day using high frequency trading strategies. The numbers were truly mind boggling - even if they were generating 1% profit, that works out to Rs40 crores a day or assuming 200 trading days in a year, Rs8,000 crore (about $1.25 billion)! It was one of those moments, when you start asking yourself if you were in the right profession. I filed away this information for future reference as I flew back to the US.
 
I finally got time to pick up Flash Boys and got hooked right away. Despite being a work of non-fiction, I could not stop turning the pages. When I put the book down, I started thinking as to how many other countries are now having high frequency trading (HFT) and I suddenly remembered the article about RKSV and their amazing turnover as a discount broker in Mumbai. What is it about high frequency trading that makes one rich overnight? Is it legal? If so, why is not everyone doing it? But first, let us take a step back and understand the evolution of high frequency trading...
 
On 19 October 1987, the Dow Jones Industrial Average crashed by 22.6%, the single largest one-day stock market decline in history. Many reasons were given for the loss, one of which was how globalization was affecting financial markets across the world. In those days, a stock was bought or sold using a broker whom you called up (or he called you!) and agreed on the stock, its price and how many. As the market crash was playing out, it was rumoured that many brokers stopped answering their phones! The US Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) addressed this and several other structural flaws and one of the remedies suggested was to have computerised trading. This set off a huge wave of modernisation and computerisation in Wall Street, which continues till date.
 
NASDAQ (and then NYSE) went public in 2000 and had their own profit targets and started finding ways to increase revenues.  To increase competition, the US government also allowed setting up of more stock exchanges and by 2010, there were 13 stock exchanges. Some of these, were setup by brokers and high frequency trading companies, which should have raised red flags (after all these are intermediaries and ideally stock exchanges should be run by those for whom they exist, i. e. investors) as Michael Lewis observes in this inteview, on how these 13 Public Stock Exchange have become an unfriendly place for the investor.
 
To be fair, there have been many benefits because of computerisation too. One of them is the cost of commission per trade. However, as technology advanced, faster computers and networks enabled some firms to start trading between computers based purely on algorithms (an algorithm can be thoughts of as a series of steps to solve a problem). At first, it seemed like all was well. In 2006, approximately 26% of all trades in the US were done by HFT firms and by 2010, this had reached 52%. What boggled the investors’ minds was how HFTs could have 4000 days of trading with NO losses! 
 
By 2008, many institutional investors, such as Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) started observing that even simple trades were costing them more than before. They started digging into this and uncovered a remarkable truth. It was as if HFT traders were lurking, waiting for them to put out an order and then act on it immediately, almost in a predatory fashion! What was even more frustrating was that they could do nothing about it. Brad Katsuyama, who headed the RBC trading desk at its New York office was determined to get to the bottom of this and with the help of other specialists, narrowed down the cause as being due to HFT companies. This led to his formulation of a process, which would make it fair for everyone and that is how IEX came about. However, more on HFT... I located this excellent description of how High Frequency Trading works on YouTube. It is only 11 minutes long and I urge you to watch it because it will help you understand this article better.
 
For those of you who are interested in knowing the state of US Stock markets today, there is an ongoing investigation by New York State Attorney General's office and by the Commodities Futures Trading Commission in Washington DC on high frequency trading practices. Ben Bernanke, the former chairman of Federal Reserve, announced last week that he is joining Citadel Group, one of the biggest HFT companies, in an advisory capacity. Please note that TD Ameritrade, one of the biggest online trading platform sells all its orders to Citadel Group! If an HFT is willing to buy all the orders from TD Ameritrade, there must be a very good reason. Today, in the US, HFT traders are essentially driving the market. For more, see the diagram below:
 
  1. HFT companies pay brokers to buy all their trades (e. g. Citadel Group buys all orders of TD Ameritrade)
  2. HFT companies pay stock exchanges huge sums of money to co-locate at the stock exchange in order to minimize the delay in monitoring orders
  3. Stock exchanges (since they need to generate profits) pay banks and institutional investors to direct orders their way. Sometimes, it happens the other way too!
Where is the investor in this picture? Was the stock exchange not established so capital could be directed to the company that needs it the most? So why are HFT companies paying brokers and stock exchanges? The answers to these questions can be found in Michael Lewis's book. The explanation is too long for this article. The number of Americans trading in stocks and derivatives has fallen to 52% from 63% about six years ago. The average investor is losing confidence in the market.
 
Now let us see how all this applies to Indian markets. HFTs make money in several ways and here are some of these:
 
1. Front running - In a simplistic way, this is similar to scalping movie tickets. Let us take a real life example... Infosys trades on NSE, BSE and several other exchanges in the country. An institutional investor (II) wants to buy for a mutual fund (MF) company about 10,000 shares of Infosys. The MF company, stipulates that the range of the purchase of the 10,000 shares be between Rs2,150 - Rs2,200. The institutional investor's trading desk runs an algorithm whereby it tries to buy a small lot (since it does not want to reveal its hand) of 100 shares at Rs2,150. Assume that the II is located close to NSE, and therefore the order appears first at NSE.
 
An HFT, co-located at NSE, picks up this order at Rs2,150 and then tries to gauge the upper limit of the II. It may try selling to the II at Rs2,250 and the II computer will reject it (because it can go only as high as Rs2,200). The HFT computer lowers the price to Rs2,225 and gets rejected again. Then it tries Rs2,200 and II buys the order!
 
Now the HFT knows the upper bound of the II and will out run the buy request of the II to all the other exchanges and buy up INFY stock and then sell it back to the II, all at Rs2,200, which the II accepts since it does not find any other lower priced shares. All this happens in a matter of milliseconds because the speed at which data runs between exchanges is slower than that of the HF traders.
 
Who loses out? The investor, who has put money in the mutual fund hoping that they will do a good job of managing his investments.
 
The profit margin may not be big but if you can do this on EACH and EVERY sale, the numbers do add up and that is what HFTs do.
 
2. Dark pools - Some of the HFTs get both sell and buy orders of stocks and instead of routing them to a stock exchange, do the trading themselves, thereby not exposing the real value of a share in the market. Regulatory bodies will not even be aware of a sale of this kind. There are 45 dark pools in the US, with companies such as Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley having at least one such pool.
 
This is not to say that all HFTs are doing this but it behoves the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) and Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to create a fair trading platform. 
 
My suggestion is to create an exchange designed along the lines of IEX. IEX opened for business in 2013 and now does about 1% of all US stock transactions. They offer only three types of trade - Market, Limit and mid-point.  IEX does not allow co-location nor does it offer any speed benefits for HFTs and therefore levels the playing field. Some of the investors in IEF are Bain Capital Ventures, Belfer Management, Brandes Investment Partners, Capital Group, Cleveland Capital Management, Franklin Resources Inc, Greenlight Capital, MassMutual Ventures, Maverick Capital, Pershing Square, Scoggin Capital Management, Senator Investment Group, Spark Capital, TDF Ventures, and Third Point Partners. 
 
Goldman Sachs announced its support to IEX and even sent some business its way for a few days (Dec 18-19, 2013) before they changed their mind and went back to their (good or bad) ways. Moreover, one more thing - the new exchange (let us call it FAIR - Fair and Intelligent Retail platform) should be located geographically in the middle of the country so as to be equidistant (more or less) to all cities... Did I hear someone say Nagpur?
 
Final Note: If this subject seems complicated, I encourage readers to click on the URLs which have a lot of information. This video stopped trading at US markets as it was playing out!
 
http://www.moneylife.in/article/what-is-high-frequency-trading-and-how-it-affects-you/41351.html